Radovich v. Locke-Paddon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Plaintiff Rafael Radovich appeals from a judgment, for defendants William F. Locke-Paddon (an attorney) and the law firm by which Locke-Paddon was employed, based on summary adjudication of issues in consolidated civil actions. The trial court was called upon to answer two questions of law:(1) Did Locke-Paddon or the law firm, in preparing a will for a client who died without executing the will, owe a duty of care to Radovich as a potential beneficiary named in the unsigned will? The trial court answered that they did not.(2) Were any claims Radovich may have had…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wilkins v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Est. of Robert H. Agnew v. Ross, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.