Legal Opinion

Barham v. Barham

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1949No. L. A. 19988PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant appeals from those portions of the interlocutory decree of divorce effecting awards of alimony and property in favor of plaintiff. He contends that such awards run counter to a purportedly complete adjustment of all property matters theretofore made by contract, between plaintiff and himself, and that the limitations of such settlement are binding upon the court herein. However, the evidence bearing upon the agreements executed by the parties in the light of their marital history, as well as settled public policy pertinent to the marriage relationship, sustains the trial court’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API