Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Odell
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1942No. Civ. 13218PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
This action arose out of an agreement by defendant to assign to plaintiffs a royalty in an oil well for a consideration which was rendered. Defendant appeals.
On July 30, 1933, defendant procured a lease from one Seeger upon a small lot in the Huntington Beach oil field. He assigned the lease to the Two-and-One Oil Company, reserving unto himself the 20 per cent interest in the net production. In August, 1933, Two-and-One commenced drilling and on the 4th of November placed its well on production. Adjacent to and east of the Seeger lease lies the Colter lease at first acquired by defendant on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Costa Mesa Union Sch. Dist. of Orange Cty. v. SEC. First Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Loper v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- R-Ranch Markets 2, Inc. v. Old Stone BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.