Legal Opinion
Flint v. Giguiere
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1920No. Civ. No. 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The complaint in this action is brief and may be set out in full as follows:
“1. That within two years last past the said plaintiff and D. B. Woods entered into a contract whereby the said D. B. Woods agreed to sell and deliver to the said plaintiff three hundred and sixty-five (365) head of cattle situated in Berryessa Valley, California.
“2. That said plaintiff and defendant agreed that if plaintiff would permit said defendant to purchase said cattle so held under contract by plaintiff, from the said Woods, that the said defendant would pay plaintiff the sum of one dollar ($1.00) per head for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bacon v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Thomas v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Heffernan v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Tobola v. WholetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Fox Chicago Realty Corp. v. Zukor's Dresses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Schick Service, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.