Legal Opinion

Nolte v. Southern California Home Building Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1938No. Civ. 2066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEONARD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action upon a promissory note for $34,500, executed by the defendant, Southern California Home Building Company, a corporation, hereafter called the company, and guaranteed by the defendants, J. B. Coker and Regina W. Coker. They were president and secretary respectively, of the company and owned practically all of its capital stock.

Appellant had, from time to time, for a number of years, loaned money to respondents. On October 1, 1932, the respondents’ joint indebtedness to appellant amounted to the total…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fly v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Heffernan v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Conner v. PlankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gorman v. HolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Thompson v. SchurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API