Legal Opinion
County of Dakota v. Lyndale Terminal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1995No. CX-93-1592PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
The narrow issue presented in this appeal is whether Minnesota Statutes section 117.145 requires a party who appeals a condemnation commissioners’ award to mail notice of the appeal to persons who record interests after the initial filing of the condemnation petition, and if so, whether a failure to do so deprives the district court of subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal. We hold that persons who record interests after the filing of the condemnation petition are not “parties of record” entitled to notice of appeal. We therefore reverse and remand for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Independent School District No. 194 Lakeville v. Tollefson Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Condemnation by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for the Fridley v. Shin Jae SuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Golden Spike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RamacciottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. SuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.