Legal Opinion
Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. Adelmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1999No. Nos. C2-97-980, C7-97-1199, C6-97-1811PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
The central issues presented by this consolidated appeal are (1) whether compliance with the notice of filing requirements of Minn.Stat. § 117.115, subd. 2 (1998) is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an appeal from á condemnation commissioners’ award; and (2) whether a condemning authority complies with Minn.Stat. § 117.145 (1998) by serving notice of appeal from a condemnation commissioners’ award on a party’s attorney but not directly on the party as well. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a condemning authority’s appeals from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. GoinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Bedow v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- County of Dakota v. Lyndale TerminalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Independent School District No. 194 Lakeville v. Tollefson Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Woodhall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.