Legal Opinion

Condemnation by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for the Fridley v. Shin Jae Suh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1996No. C6-96-924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an eminent domain proceeding in which the district court dismissed the con-demnor’s appeal from a Commissioners’ award for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because we conclude that a fatal jurisdictional defect resulted from the condemnor’s failure to give some of the parties who were named in the condemnation petition notice of the filing of the Commissioners’ report and notice of the appeal from the award, we affirm.

FACTS

The Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) filed an eminent domain petition in January 1995 to acquire a parcel of land that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Lunning v. Land O'LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Johnson v. HagbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. State v. GoinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Spot Weld, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. SuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API