Legal Opinion
State v. Rust
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1959No. 37,719PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The State of Minnesota by condemnation proceedings acquired certain parcels of land for state highway purposes in Marshall County. The petition was properly filed, proper notice was given, and a proper hearing was held. After being duly appointed by the district court the commissioners filed their report on December 27, 1957, with the clerk of the district court after which notice of the report was promptly sent to all parties who' had an interest in parcel 61.
It appears that there were five property interests in parcel 61, as follows:
Alvin M. Nordvick — Holder of Contract for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schlecht v. SchlechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Eyre v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- St. Louis Car Co. v. Stillwater Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex el. Nelson v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Slayton Gun Club v. Town of Shetek, Murray CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. First Avenue Realty Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- County of Dakota v. Lyndale TerminalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Haymaker v. General Tire, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.