Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Golden Spike, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant contends the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case because appellant and respondent had failed to give proper notice of appeal from the commissioner’s award to all interested parties. The parties on appeal are the only remaining interested parties of record in this ease. We affirm.
FACTS
In December 1988, respondent Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) brought an action in eminent domain to quick-take possession of a city block located in downtown Minneapolis. Appellant Golden Spike, Inc., leased space in one of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- County of Dakota v. Lyndale TerminalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Independent School District No. 194 Lakeville v. Tollefson Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Judd v. State Ex Rel. HumpreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Condemnation by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for the Fridley v. Shin Jae SuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. SuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999