Legal Opinion

CONDEMNATION BY HOUS. & REDEV. v. Suh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1996No. C6-96-924Published

1Opinion of the Court

553 N.W.2d 115 (1996)

In the Matter of CONDEMNATION BY the HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR the CITY OF FRIDLEY, Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Shin Jae SUH, et al., Respondents.

No. C6-96-924.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 17, 1996.

Review Denied November 20, 1996.

Scott M. Lepak, James D. Hoeft, Virgil C. Herrick, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd., City of Fridley HRA, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Leland J. Frankman, Minneapolis, for Respondent Shin Jae Suh.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and LANSING and WILLIS, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an eminent domain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Lunning v. Land O'LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Johnson v. HagbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. State v. GoinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API