Legal Opinion
H.B. Zachry Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 5, 1993No. 91-1585CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff argued that genuine issues of material fact preclude allowance of the motion and requested oral argument on the matter. Because the facts and legal arguments were presented adequately in the briefs and record, and in view of the conclusions reached herein, oral argument is deemed unnecessary.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff, H.B. Zachry Company, entered into a contract with defendant, through the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau), to construct the Federal Correctional Institution at Three Rivers,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crown Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Warr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Hawkins & Powers Aviation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.