Legal Opinion

Warr v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2000No. 99-288 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This is a suit by the tenant of Native American allottees against the government for monetary damages arising out of crop losses on the rented land due to inadequate water supplies from the Wapato Irrigation Project. The action is before this court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary for Judgment (Def.’s Mot.). With regard to the jurisdictional challenge, the primary issue is whether or not a contract existed between plaintiff tenant and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Plaintiff first filed suit in the United States District…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peninsula Group Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. McNabb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Mendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Sumter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API