Legal Opinion
The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 2, 1983No. Appeal 65-82PublishedCited by 271 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from a final decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or board), ASBCA No. 25714, 82-1 BCA 115,779. The ASBCA held that (1) it had jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA or Act), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (Supp. Y 1981), to decide a claim brought directly by a subcontractor, Johnson Controls, Inc. (Johnson); (2) Johnson was the proper party to certify the claim under the CDA; and (3) on the merits, Johnson was entitled to an equitable adjustment for the supply of redundant hardware. Since we hold that there was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by271 opinions
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Katz v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.