Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 10, 2001No. 99-471CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and Defendant’s Motion for Partial Relief from Remand Order. Plaintiffs, Laureen M. Davis and her son Zachary A. Davis, seek compensation under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act (PSOBA), 42 U.S.C. § 3796 (1994), for the death of their late husband and father, Officer Kenneth L. Davis of the Seattle Police Department. The PSOBA provides payment of a $100,000 death benefit to the surviving spouse and children of a…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Elk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Bice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Maria Demutiis and Nicolas Demutiis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Bice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API