Legal Opinion

State v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1979No. 49PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court erred in not allowing his motion for a new trial because of the admission of certain testimony. We find no merit in this assignment.

The testimony complained of was given by Special S.B.I. Agent S. T. Carpenter who was stipulated to be an expert in the field of firearms identification. The witness was shown the shotgun found in defendant’s car and was asked to explain the way the gun operated. Included in a detailed description of the weapon and how it functioned, Mr. Carptenter stated that if there was a round…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API