State v. Pope
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.
The motives of Judge Williams are not in question on this appeal. Defendant’s brief states: “Judge Williams went to a lot of trouble . . . out of a sense of duty. He knew none of the parties and had no prior feelings one way or the other. In fact, as the record shows, on his own initiative Judge Williams brought out in open court what he apparently thought was the most important matter he had elicited in chambers — the theft of the gasoline not charged in any of the bills or warrants. Nevertheless, the defendant feels he was entitled to hear what the Judge heard at the time he heard it and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stephan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. KunzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.