Legal Opinion

State v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1982No. 8124SC987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues, by his first assignment of error, that the court erred by admitting into evidence a television news film and two human skulls. He contends that the evidence was not authenticated, and that it was irrelevant and inflammatory in light of the fact that the disturbance of the graves was stipulated.

The trial judge instructed the jury that the film was “offered and admitted for the sole purpose of illustrating or explaining the testimony of this or other witnesses who may appear before you . ... It may not be considered by you for any other purpose.” Sheriff E.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. QuallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. SiskCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API