Legal Opinion

State v. Ahearn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1983No. 596A82PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Because this case presents us with our first opportunity to fully discuss the policies, purposes, and implementation of the new “Fair Sentencing Act,” we find it appropriate to discuss the issues presented in the context of the historical background of the Act and to set out pertinent portions of the statute. 1 In response to a perceived need for certainty in sentencing, to a perceived evil of disparate sentencing, and to a perceived problem in affording trial judges and parole authorities unbridled discretion in imposing sentences, Governor James B. Hunt, Jr., urged the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API