Legal Opinion

State v. Locklear

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 111PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

After verdict and before sentencing, the State examined a deputy sheriff who testified, over defendant’s objection, that an unnamed reliable informant had told the witness he had purchased marijuana from defendant on many occasions and that defendant was “doing between $500 and $1,000 worth of grass a week.” Following pre-sentencing statements by defense counsel and the district attorney, the trial court said:

“I cannot conclude that this is an appropriate case for probation. And it does seem to me that the testimony of Leonard lacks plausibility. It’s just not plausible to me…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Domingo-Gomez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API