Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1971No. 73PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant’s first thirty-nine exceptions and assignments of error based thereon are addressed to the admission of evidence. Those which merit discussion will be considered in numerical order.

Defendant initially asserts that the trial court erred in allowing the witness Donald Brake to testify that when defendant, at the Hamburger Shop shortly after the fight, told him he had kicked Jimmie Collie so hard he had sprained his ankle, he “seemed to be joking about it.” Defendant claims the witness was thus permitted to state a conclusion which was irrelevant and highly prejudicial…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. FincherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API