Xerox Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Xerox Corporation appeals the judgment of the Court of International Trade dismissing its appeal from a formal protest with the U.S. Customs Service for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Xerox Corp. v. United States, 118 F.Supp.2d 1353 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2000). Because ministerial errors by the Customs Service in its administration of antidumping duty orders may be proper subjects of Customs protests and jurisdiction was proper, we reverse and remand.
Background
In 1994 and 1995, Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) imported shipments of rubber and plastic feed belts from Japan to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Juice Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.