Legal Opinion
Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 13, 1998No. 97-1261, 97-1338PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue in these two cases, which we decide in a single opinion, is whether the failure of an importer to exhaust its administrative remedy by. seeking a ruling by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) that an antidumping order does not cover certain products it imported, precludes it from obtaining review of that issue in the Court of International Trade by there challenging the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) denial of its subsequent protest to Customs’ assessment of antidumping duties on the products. The Court of International Trade dismissed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Stephen W. Richey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.