Legal Opinion
Xerox Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 19, 2000No. SLIP OP. 00-133; 97-03-00435PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum & Order
AQUILINO, Judge.
Some five years after publication of the Antidumping Duty Order of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Industrial Belts and Components and Parts Thereof, Whether Cured or Uncured, From Japan, 54 Fed.Reg. 25,314 (June 14, 1989), by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”), Inv. No. A-588-807, goods from Japan entered the port of Rochester, New York, consigned to the Xerox Corporation, Nos. 818-0183467-2 (Sept. 22, 1994) and 818-0187011-4 (April 14, 1995). The entry summary of each, executed by the customhouse broker on Customs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Nichimen America, Inc., Formerly Known as Nichimen Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Xerox Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- J.S. Stone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- LDA Incorporado v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Ugine & Alz Belgium, N v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Lda Incorporado\ v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.