Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 22, 2006No. 05-1357PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler”) appeals from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade denying Daimler’s motion to amend its summons to include additional protests. The Court of International Trade concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over protests not listed in the original summons because the 180-day period for filing a summons to contest the denial of those protests had expired before the date of the proposed amendment. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States, 350 F.Supp.2d 1339, 1341-42 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2004) (Chief Judge Restani). We affirm.
BA…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- GTA Containers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- H & H Wholesale Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- American Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.