Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 8, 2008No. 2008-1071PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, finding no subject matter jurisdiction over its claim to find its surety bonds unenforceable. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 507 F.Supp.2d 1331 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007). Because we agree that the true nature of the action is a failure to file an administrative protest to a demand for payment on a surety bond, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
In February 2004, importer Brother Packaging imported three entries of polyethylene t-shirt bags into the United States pursuant to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Boris SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, Solarworld Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Hutchison Quality Furniture, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Chemsol, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.