Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
The three appellants, referred to collectively as “Arcelor,” appeal from a decision of the Court of International Trade denying a request for a preliminary injunction to prevent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) from liquidating certain entries pursuant to liquidation instructions issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). Because we conclude that the trial court erred in its analysis of the issue of irreparable harm, we reverse and remand.
I
Arcelor imports stainless steel plate in coils (“SSPC”). In 1998, Commerce initiated antidumping and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- American Signature, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Skf USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, Chairman Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Comm'r Kevin K. McAleenan, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer, Solarworld Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.