Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ayres-Fountain
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The Supreme Court of Delaware, in an unreported, per curiam opinion, dated July 8, 2002, “halving] considered this matter seriously ... [and] fmd[ing] the Board [on Professional Responsibility]^ recommendation ... to be appropriate in light of the presence of the following aggravating factors: a substantial prior disciplinary record; a pattern of misconduct; multiple violations; and engaging in deceptive practices during the disciplinary process,” accepted that recommendation and the Board’s report supporting the recommendation and ordered Caroline Patricia Ayres-Fountain, the respondent, a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Mississippi Bar v. DrungoleMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GubermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.