Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ayres-Fountain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 2003No. 11, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Supreme Court of Delaware, in an unreported, per curiam opinion, dated July 8, 2002, “halving] considered this matter seriously ... [and] fmd[ing] the Board [on Professional Responsibility]^ recommendation ... to be appropriate in light of the presence of the following aggravating factors: a substantial prior disciplinary record; a pattern of misconduct; multiple violations; and engaging in deceptive practices during the disciplinary process,” accepted that recommendation and the Board’s report supporting the recommendation and ordered Caroline Patricia Ayres-Fountain, the respondent, a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GittensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Mississippi Bar v. DrungoleMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GubermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API