Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Weiss
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 22, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 15, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioner, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(b),1 filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Randy A. Weiss, respondent, for violation of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC).2 The petition alleged that the respondent violated MRPC 8.4 sections (b), (c) and (d)3 by converting funds due to his law firm in fifty-four separate transactions from 1993 to 1996, in the total amount of $676,465.99.
In accordance with Maryland Rule 16-752(a)4 this Court assigned the matter to Judge Louise G.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GisrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.