Attorney Grievance Commission v. Whitehead
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
H. Allen Whitehead, respondent, was disbarred by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, based upon respondent’s consent. Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioner, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(b), 1 and based on the misconduct for which respondent was disbarred in the District of Columbia filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against respondent for violation of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). 2 The petition alleged that the respondent unethically and unprofessionally violated MRPC 8.4 and 1.15. 3 Petitioner…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.