State v. Poitra
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Linus Poitra appealed a jury conviction finding him guilty of theft of property. We hold this record does not establish Poitra knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
[¶ 2] In February 1996, the State charged Poitra and Blaine Brunelle with theft of property for “knowingly obtain[ing] property valued in excess of $500.00 belonging to Northwest Industrial Supply by deception by falsely stating that they worked for Basic Concrete Company and charging said property to the account of Basie Concrete Company.” The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Fargo v. RockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Marschner v. MarschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.