Legal Opinion
State v. Ochoa
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2004No. 20030132, 20030133PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Anthony Ochoa appeals from the criminal judgment for possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.4-03, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(l)(a). Ochoa argues the magistrate erred in issuing the search warrant, claiming probable cause was improperly based on an unreliable informant; he was not afforded the opportunity to assist in his own defense; and he was denied his right to a speedy trial. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In July 2002, Sheree Rose began working as an informant for Deputy Mark…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MoranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.