Legal Opinion
City of Fargo v. Rockwell
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1999No. 980305PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bronson Jamal Rockwell appealed from a trial court judgment of conviction finding him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. He asserts his right to counsel was violated. We conclude Rockwell knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel and therefore affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On April 26, 1998, Rockwell was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The trial court appointed Cash Aaland as counsel to represent Rockwell. Rockwell, through Aaland, filed a N.D.R.Crim.P. 16 discovery request and filed a motion to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Howard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Lilly SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Terrance Ray TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.