Legal Opinion

Marschner v. Marschner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2001No. 20000172PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Following a thirty-seven year marriage, Richard and Carol Marschner were divorced. After the divorce trial, Carol Marschner moved for a new trial, alleging, among other things, that the district court erred in including her inheritance from her mother in the marital estate and in not awarding spousal support. The district court denied the motion, and Carol Marschner appealed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Carol Marschner was married to Richard Marschner in 1962. At the time of trial she was 58 years old. Her married life was spent on the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Heley v. HeleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Corbett v. CorbettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Horner v. HornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API