Legal Opinion
State v. Harmon
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1998No. Criminal Nos. 960206-960208, Civil Nos. 970100-970102PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Carl Aubrey Harmon appealed from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition, felonious restraint, and terrorizing. We conclude Harmon’s post-conviction appeal was not timely. We also conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying substitute counsel, Harmon waived his right to counsel, the prosecution’s closing remarks were not improper, and Harmon was not deprived of a fair and impartial jury. We therefore dismiss in part and affirm in part.
I
[¶ 2] On July 21, 1995, Carl A. Harmon, III, was charged with gross sexual…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.