Legal Opinion

Hitz v. Hitz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2008No. 20070211PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Lois Konzak Hitz (“Konzak”) appeals an amended judgment dividing marital property between her and her former husband, John Hitz (“Hitz”). We affirm the amended judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Konzak and Hitz were married June 25, 1994. Konzak commenced a divorce action in January 2005. Following post-trial briefing, an amended judgment, dividing and distributing the debts and assets between Konzak and Hitz, was entered in May 2007. In its findings of fact, conclusions of law, order for amended judgment and amended judgment, the district court awarded net property of $1,257,409 to Hitz…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Marsden v. KoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McCarthy v. McCarthyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API