Legal Opinion
State v. Dvorak
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 2000No. 990135PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Larry Dvorak appealed a criminal conviction for violating a domestic violence protection order. Dvorak argues he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. We conclude this record demonstrates Dvorak voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to counsel. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In April 1998, Dvorak was charged under N.D.C.C. § 14-07.1-06 with violating a domestic violence protection order by contacting his children and his ex-wife’s parents in contravention of a protection order issued in May 1997. The complaint alleged the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HolteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.