Legal Opinion
Davis v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1938No. L. A. 16657PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
By this action for an injunction and declaratory relief the plaintiff sought to test the validity of the emergency clause of Statutes of 1937, page 153. That act repealed the act of 1,929 (Stats. 1929, p. 357), which provided for the payment of retirement compensation to teachers and other employees. The act of 1929 was declared unconstitutional in Los Angeles City School Dist. v. Griffin, 3 Cal. (2d) 651 [46 Pac. (2d) 141].
The 1937 enactment presented a different plan or method for adopting a pension and retirement system in the school districts throughout the state. Section 5.1100 thereby…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Claypool v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.