Legal Opinion

Amwest Surety Insurance v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1995No. S037405PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

In 1988, the voters approved Proposition 103, an initiative measure entitled the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act. Among other provisions affecting certain types of insurance, Proposition 103 imposed a rate rollback and required that any subsequent rate increase, prior to its use, be approved by the Insurance Commissioner. Section 8(b) of Proposition 103 provides: “The provisions of this act shall not be amended by the Legislature except to further its purposes . . . .” (Stats. 1988, p. A-290.)

In 1990, the Legislature enacted Insurance Code section 1861.135,1 which…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API