Legal Opinion

Naudzius v. Lahr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1931No. Docket No. 129, Calendar No. 35,052PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff is 16 years old. Her declaration charges that on August 18, 1929, while she was riding as a gratuitous passenger in defendant’s automobile .on the highway, she was injured as a consequence of defendant’s negligence, both ordinary and gross.j Defendant moved to dismiss the declaration on the groundjdiat it did not charge actionable gross negligence, and that defendant was not liable for ordinary negligence because of Act No. 19, Pub. Acts 1929, amending Act No. 302, Pub. Acts 1915 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4648), for the regulation of motor vehicles and their operators upon the highways,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API