Legal Opinion

Simpson v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1953No. L. A. 21945PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs seek to restrain defendant city and two officials from carrying into effect subsection (h) of section 53.11 of a Los Angeles city ordinance* which provides, *276in part, that the Department of Animal Regulation shall surrender unclaimed animals which have been impounded for five days to reputable institutions of learning, hospitals and laboratories that have been certified by the city health officer as organizations which will use animals humanely for the good of mankind in medical research. General demurrers were sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs failed to amend, and judgment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API