Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Claypool v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1992No. C011580PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

In this original mandamus proceeding members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and their employee organizations (collectively Petitioners), challenge the constitutionality of two parts of chapter 83 of the Statutes of 1991 (Chapter 83). One part repeals three funded supplemental cost of living (Cola) programs and directs that the funds be used to offset contributions otherwise due from PERS employers. The other transfers the responsibility for actuarial determinations from the PERS board to an actuary acting under a contract with the Governor.

Petitioners and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API