Legal Opinion

Canales v. City of Alviso

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1970No. S.F. 22724PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Petitioners brought an action to contest an election held in the City of Alviso in January of 1968 to determine whether that city should consolidate with the City of San Jose. The petitioners alleged that they were electors of Alviso, that consolidation carried only because of illegal votes, that respondents offered valuable consideration to induce Alvisans to vote in favor of consolidation, and that the election board responsible for the conduct of the election committed various acts of misconduct. (Elec. Code, § 20021.)

After a recount of ballots (id., § 20084), the tally…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Quarterman v. KefauverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API