Legal Opinion
County of Freeborn v. Bryson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1980No. 50214PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Appellants William H. and Arlene Bry-son, landowners in this eminent domain proceeding, appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for an award of costs and attorneys fees against respondent, County of Freeborn.
This matter has been before us on two prior occasions. Respondent originally brought an action to condemn land for a roadway through a marsh owned by appellants. However, in County of Freeborn v. Bryson (Bryson I), 297 Minn. 218, 210 N.W.2d 290 (1973), and County of Freeborn v. Bryson (Bryson II), 309 Minn. 178, 243 N.W.2d 316 (1976), appellants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Martineau v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- COUNTY OF FREEBORN BY TUVESON v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solko v. State Roads Commission of State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Sipe v. KalitowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Anderson v. City of CokatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980