Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1993No. C2-93-47PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In May 1983, as part of a highway development project, respondent State of Minnesota used the “quick take” provision of the eminent domain statute, Minn.Stat. § 117.-042 (1982), to acquire title to real estate owned by appellant Baillon Company. The taking deprived Baillon’s remaining land of direct highway access. The state offered Baillon $1300 for the taking. In March 1985, the condemnation commissioners awarded Baillon $2530 for the lost land and $302,400 for lost highway access. Both parties appealed to district court and a jury awarded Baillon $270,000. In August…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Benson Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. First District Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. United States v. 341.45 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Johnson v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Abraham v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Manor Care Inc. v. Tom DouglasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API