Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Abbott
California Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1932No. Docket Nos. L.A. 13122, 13123, 13124, 13125, 13126, 13127, 13128, 13129, 13130, 13131, 13132, 13133, 13134, 13135, 13136, 13137, 13138, 13139, 13140, 13141, 13142, 13143, 13144, 13145PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Pursuant to stipulations of the parties, the above-entitled twenty-four cases have been consolidated for decision, it being agreed that all of the cases may be determined upon the briefs and arguments filed in L. A. 13122. Whatever is said in this opinion, therefore, in reference to the Halperin case will apply equally to the other twenty-three cases.
L. A. 13122 involves an appeal by the plaintiff, the City of Los Angeles, from a judgment dismissing a condemnation action, which judgment of dismissal allowed respondent Halperin his costs, including attorneys’ fees. The other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ballard v. SearlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Epling v. DicksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Geneseo v. Illinois Northern Utilities Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.