Legal Opinion

Martineau v. State Conservation Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1972No. 252, 253PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether appellant is entitled to have a reasonable amount of attorney’s fees assessed against the state in this action.

This court has frequently held that costs may not be taxed against the state or an administrative agency of the state unless expressly authorized by statute. Frankenthal v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers’ Board (1958), 3 Wis. 2d 249, 257, 258, 88 N. W. 2d 352, 89 N. W. 2d 825; Klingseisen v. State Highway Comm. (1964), 22 Wis. 2d 364, 370, 126 N. W. 2d 40; cf: State ex rel. Reynolds v. Smith (1963), 19 Wis. 2d 577, 583, 120 N. W. 2d…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Frankenthal v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Detroit International Bridge Co. v. American Seed Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. LanterIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. W.H. Pugh Coal Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Richland School District v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sheely v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Leathem Smith Lodge, Inc. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API