Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Freeborn v. Bryson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1973No. 43569, 43574 and 43582PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

This action was brought in response to condemnation proceedings initiated by the County of Freeborn for the purpose of acquiring certain lands for the construction of a county highway. William H. Bryson and Arlene Bryson, owners of lands sought to be condemned, filed an answer in the condemnation proceedings and brought this action pursuant to Minn. St. c. 116B (Minnesota Environmental Rights Act) alleging that the proposed condemnation would materially and adversely affect portions of a natural wildlife marsh. Permission was granted to the at-/ torney general and the Sierra…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. State v. HawkOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Monaghan v. ArmatageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Bergin v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. COUNTY OF FREEBORN BY TUVESON v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Corwine v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API