Legal Opinion

Sipe v. Kalitowski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1986No. C6-86-288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

After the trial court consolidated two cases, the first an environmental action brought by appellant landowners against respondent City of Greenfield, and the second a condemnation action brought by the city against the owners, the city discontinued the condemnation action. The parties then stipulated to the dismissal of all claims except for the amount of attorneys’ fees appellants could recover. The trial court awarded fees incurred in defense of the condemnation action but denied recovery of fees incurred in pursuit of the environmental action. We reverse.

FACTS

On June…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. City of Thief River Falls v. SwickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Solko v. State Roads Commission of State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Anderson v. City of CokatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API