Anderson v. City of Cokato

OPINION

PARKER, Judge

Appellant Harlan Anderson challenges the district court’s determination that Minn.Stat. § 117.195, subd. 2 (2000), did not provide a remedy for appellant when the condemning authority changed its purpose for condemning appellant’s former land. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent City of Cokato petitioned for condemnation of appellant Harlan Anderson’s entire tract of real estate for the purpose of storm water management. Respondent then amended the petition to include the purpose of economic develop*123ment. At a later hearing, respondent again amended the petition eliminating the…